The New Rules Of Empire

What happens when the most powerful country on earth decides the old rules no longer apply to anyone. Playing 19th Century Imperialism with 21st Century Nukes.

Now that Donald Trump has torn up a hundred years of international agreements and the frameworks built to constrain old-school imperialism, here’s what we’re likely to see, in the western hemisphere and everywhere else, under the new rules of the game.

The Venezuela operation already happened. President War Crimes sent in Delta Force, captured Maduro, and declared himself acting president of a foreign country. In its aftermath, he threatened regime change in Cuba, Mexico, and Colombia. That is the proof of concept. That is the leverage. Which means that in the near term, I don’t expect we’re necessarily looking at another full military invasion, because Trump doesn’t need one. He’s already demonstrated he will do it. He can now use that as a cudgel to threaten countries into better trade terms, resource concessions, and policy compliance. Cuba, Colombia, Greenland, Canada — he doesn’t have to invade them if the credible threat of invasion gets him what he wants.

That is the actual heart of American imperialism, always has been. Wringing the maximum economic advantage out of the western hemisphere by whatever means necessary. If he can do that without boots on the ground, that’s what’s going to happen. For now.

However, it gets genuinely fucking dangerous when the more consequential story is what the rest of the world just learned. Putin has been watching. Trump has already signaled he has zero interest in stopping Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the quid pro quo, giving Russia a freer hand while the U.S. consolidates Venezuela, almost certainly means continuing to squeeze Ukraine’s military aid, prolonging a war that is actively killing people. That’s bad enough. But Putin is also a student of precedent. If the United States can walk into a sovereign country, topple its leader, and install itself as the governing authority, Putin has every reason to ask why the same logic can’t apply to him. Take Kyrgyzstan — a former Soviet republic sitting on rare earth deposits Putin desperately needs. The logic is right there. Why not just take it? Dementia Don just re-wrote precedence and showed him how.

And it’s not just Moscow doing the math. Look at South Asia. In April 2025, militants killed 26 people in Kashmir. India launched strikes on nine targets inside Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir — the most aggressive cross-border military action between the two countries in decades. They pulled back from the brink, and a ceasefire is barely holding. But both of these countries have nuclear weapons. Both have fought four wars over Kashmir since 1948. And Prime Minister Modi explicitly framed Operation Sindoor as “a new benchmark,” meaning India just reset its own rules of engagement. Dipshit Don didn’t cause the Pahalgam attack, but he is presiding over a world where the message is screaming to authoritarians globally that sovereign borders are mere suggestions, military force is a legitimate first response, and the international community will not stop you. India heard that. Pakistan heard that. The next time a militant attack happens in Kashmir, and there will be a next time, the question is whether either government believes there’s any reason to stop short of something catastrophic.

Even more dangerous is the lesson China is drawing from this. China has coveted Taiwan for decades. The U.S. has never formally recognized Taiwan as an independent country, but it has consistently recognized Taiwan’s right to exist and govern itself. Trump just demonstrated that if you want a country, you go in, remove the leadership, and take it. Taiwan’s TSMC produces more than 90% of the world’s most advanced semiconductor chips, and they account for over 60% of global foundry revenue and roughly 20% of Taiwan’s entire GDP. China seizing that manufacturing capacity wouldn’t just be a geopolitical crisis, it would be a civilizational chokepoint. And the United States would face an impossible choice: go to war with a nuclear-armed China over an island it refuses to formally recognize, or step back and hand Beijing a free hand in the Pacific. Neither outcome is good. Both are now more plausible than they were six months ago.

The bottom line is that by tearing up the post-WWII rulebook and reverting to 19th-century imperialism logic, the United States has not made itself stronger. It has opened the goddamn floodgates. Every authoritarian with territorial ambitions and a grievance just got a green light. Same old empire-building playbook, except now, everyone at the table has nuclear weapons.

If a paid subscription isn’t in the cards right now, I completely get it — truly. But if you’ve ever read something here and thought “damn, she needs to keep doing this,” you can throw a few bucks in the tip jar over at Buy Me a Coffee.

No pressure. No guilt. Just me, asking nicely, with my hand out like a very earnest raccoon who writes controversial essays.

☕ buymeacoffee.com/eeviebateman

Thank you for being here. Seriously. You make this worth doing.